Corruption in Luxembourg

Luxembourgdomstolen, med dommer Frédéric Mersch i spissen, dømte paret til å fjerne artikkelen; Corruption in Luxembourg – Part I og til å betale € 25.000,- (US $ 32,700,- eller ca NOK 200.000,-) i tvangsmulkt for hver dag denne artikkelen blir stående på nettstedet rettsnorge. Dommen falt en gang i mai 2012, og artikkelen har følgelig stått i over 400 dager etter at dommen falt. La meg med en gang si at min samboer ikke har noe med publisering på RettsNorge™ å gjøre.

A court in Luxembourg, presided by Judge Frederic Mersch, sentenced the couple to remove the article; Corruption in Luxembourg - Part I and to pay € 25.000,- (U.S. $ 32.700,- or approximately NOK 200.000,-) in fines for each day this article remains on the site RettsNorge. The verdict fell sometime in May 2012, which means that the article has been online (continuously published) for 400 days since Mersch handed down his judgement.

It is a sad day for the people of the world, for their right to peace, to be free and to prosper, and you should all sit down and think a little bit on how this actually could happen, and the consequences of having such a corrupt nation deliberating over international peace and security. As you will understand from reading this article including all links, Luxembourg’s membership in the Security Council is nothing but a contradiction.

CORRUPTION IN LUXEMBOURG

“This pirate banking system now launders, shelters, manages and if necessary re-domiciles the riches of many of the worlds worst villains, as well as the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities of many of our wealthiest individuals, alongside our most successful mainstream banks, corporations, shipping companies, insurance companies, accounting firms and law firms.”

*        *        *

Crimes – where to go with your complaints
When your life and property is at stake due to a crime, what do you do? You normally contact the police. So, what do you expect from the police, then? Instead of answering this for you, I refer you to the London police’[1] definition of its role and responsibilities:

One of the main reasons for our “problems” in Luxembourg, is that we can prove that Danske Bank International has carried out unauthorized and thus illegal financial service in Norway (e.g. encouraging and assisting Norwegian consumers to commit tax fraud, hence the bank has conspired to commit tax fraud), a service the bank has prospered from, while the consumers have lost all their savings.

In this regard, the bank corrupted a bailiff in Luxembourg, Martine Lise, and asked her to declare to the Court of First Instance that she had summoned us to a court hearing of which Alex Schmitt had instigated in September 2011. Consequently Martine Lise declared to the court that she had served the summons on September 6 2011, and by this declaration she made herself an accomplice to serious financial crime. For a backdrop of the case, please read this article.