Arms dealers and money makers
In recent articles I have worked myself closer to the core of the truth about the Riis-family, unearthing information which indicates that the Riis’ gives even the imposter of the last century, Rasputin, a close run.
For years I was this family’s assistant, in-house lawyer, friend and joint partner in their claims against the Norwegian Government. This was turned upside down the moment the late Consul Riis was killed. I have recently got information indicating that about a year before the murder, the rest of the family gathered together some lawyers, journalists and judges in a secret alliance planning to take me out.
mentioned, the late Consul Riis was helped out of his
This Certificate of the cause of Death (sent to me by the
hospital late July 2007) is produced on
This identical Certificate of the cause of Death, allegedly
produced on May 30 2006 but by the same institution and by the same doctor, has
been falsified as the doctor for some reason or other has changed the
deceased’s domicile. This document was sent to me from the
This Death Certificate was sent to me on
This Death Certificate which should be identical with the
above said Certificate (as there could only exist one such certificate at the
time) was sent to me on
None of the documents are signed by the police, which give proof that the body was never legally released from Swedish authorities.
of false documents is a crime. This crime gets even more serious as the
documents have been produced by Swedish officials in order – it seems – to
cover up a murder. The Swedish hospital was bribed
to falsify documents to avoid an autopsy and a Monegasque intervention. The
actions were the door-opener to get rid of Einar’s
that everything close to Einar and the murder was
concealed and protected from any outside questions/intervention, even from the
law itself. It took the Riis’ approximately 70 hours
to get rid of Einar’s body. He was smuggled with
false/falsified papers out of
Following the cremation of the late Consul Riis, a court in Norway (Asker and Bærum Probate Court) produced a false death protocol, presumably to ease the body – or the dust and whatever reason caused it – out of the system, and thus giving the scorned widow free access to the estate of the late Consul. As the Scandinavian readers can observe, the deceased is listed with no heirs beside his wife (which means no children), incorrect domicile, no testament/will (although the will was known to the family and has been presented before Monegasque authorities), no information about where he died or whether there has been issued a Death Certificate, etc. Everything possible is wrong with this document.
Some months after the murder, I started to get signs that something was out of the ordinary. The ageing Mrs. Amelia Riis all of a sudden settled a case between herself and her long time enemy, a lawyer which according to the late Consul Riis had betrayed the family. His name is Ole Kristian Aabø-Evensen. It has been indicated that the settlement was planned prior to the murder, but of obvious reasons it couldn’t be carried out as long as Einar was alive. This settlement was the first obvious sign I got that something was really not as it should be. You will find an introduction to this case here (not available yet).
In the spring
of 2007 the Riis’ managed to bribe off (see note 1)
some judges in
The thread through this operation against me: the Riis-family has been fighting a just fight for over 30 years; the family is really poor (since the late 1970’ early 1980’), impoverished; and that I somehow have ran away with their money. If I say; that’s not true!, you will say; yea, right. This is how imposters work together with media institutions. They don’t have to prove anything, and you wouldn’t stand a chance against them; that is if you don’t have the guts to blow this house of cards down yourself.
So, there we are. The only thing left for me to do is to give you, the reader, a fair chance to have your own say based on documents and not on pure fantasies produced by an alliance working for a certain outcome.
As a consequence of the situation being turned upside down, I was forced to dive into the Riis’ life and whereabouts from the very beginning and up till today: What a life they have had, and what a lie they have made the Norwegian journalists, politicians, readers, listeners and viewers of news to believe in for more than 30 years.
The core of the Riis’ consists of Mrs. Amelia Riis (aka Amelia Olsen, aka Dagny Amelia Olsen Riis, aka A. Olsen, aka Dagny Riis, aka Dagny Olsen); Mr. Kenneth Patrizio Riis (aka Patrizio Riis, aka KP Riis, aka KPZ, aka Patrizio Kenneth Riis, aka Pat Riis, aka P. Riis); Benedicte Riis-Duryea (aka Bene, aka Benediate R. Duryea, Benedicte R. Duryea, aka Benedicte Riis, aka Benedicte Duryea); Stephen Charles Dureya (aka Steven, aka Steve, aka Stephen C Duryea, aka Stephen Duryea Te) and Mr. Alessandro Sangue (aka Alexander Sangue, aka Alex, aka A. Sangue).
she, and what is her position in the family hierarchy? It seems that she has
been the keeper and protector of the hidden family-fortune in the
mentioned before, in
You could often hear (ever since the early 1980’) the late Consul Riis state, now and then accompanied with a hand slamming to the table: “We have nothing left! They have drained us. They have taken everything from us. We have done nothing wrong but claiming our inheritance which the Government stole from a poor woman”, pointing at Amelia. This was basically the setting for the common Norwegian.
fight has been described as unfair, and a few commentators have thus dared
their jobs in expressing the Government’s responsibility and how unfair they
felt the judges have treated this family in the courts during the years. I have
even won three cases for this family against the
Diving into Benedicte Riis-Duryea’s life
official document presented before the Notary Me Henry Rey,
to official information retrieved from
moment we believe she lives in
In my investigation I came over a name suspiciously similar to Benedicte; Benediate R. Duryea, living at the same addresses as Benedicte, related to the same husband, Mr. Stephen Charles Duryea. I had to check whether this was just a wrong spelling or maybe something more systemized. It turned out not to be a wrong spelling.
here is that this Benediate is born on
There is always a motivation behind such activity, and that is normally to ease once way away from tax authorities, the police, court orders, other authorities, old friends, creditors and others. I am in the possession of handwritten notes connecting Benedicte Riis-Duryea to serious tax fraud in Italy, as well as to serious corruption against Uganda officials, a story which I will refer to in an another article. Mrs Riis-Duryea has all the wrong reasons in the world to act as she does.
To cut this short, Benedicte Riis-Duryea, Benediate R. Dureya and Stephen Duryea are the owners/holders of or have been the owners/holders of the following properties, many of them located nearby a golf course:
Amelia Riis (aka Amelia Olsen, aka Dagny Amelia Olsen Riis, aka A. Olsen, aka Dagny Riis, aka Dagny Olsen):
1. 146 Elsie St,
2. 11 Whiting Court,
Kenneth Patrizio Riis (aka Patrizio Riis, aka KP Riis, aka KPZ, aka Patrizio Kenneth Riis, aka Pat Riis, aka P. Riis):
1. Box 111721,
2. 250 W 50TH ST,
3. 2503 Park Hill CT E,
Benedicte Riis-Duryea (aka Bene, aka Benediate R. Duryea, Benedicte R. Duryea, aka Benedicte Riis, aka Benedicte Duryea):
1. 11 WHITING Court
2. 146 ELSIE ST V
3. 359 BOCANA
Benediata Riis-Duryea (aka Bene, aka Benediate R. Duryea, Benedicte R. Duryea, aka Benedicte Riis, aka Benedicte Duryea):
1. 46 ELSIE ST
2. 146 ELSIE ST
3. 1835 CRYSTAL AIR DR SOUTH
Stephen Charles Duryea (aka Steven, aka Steve, aka Stephen C Duryea):
1. 1700 BUSH
2. 870 MARKET FIELDCREST
3. 640 TEMPO TRAIL #I CREVE
4. 1835 CRYSTAL AIR DR S
5. 46 ELSIE ST
6. 146 ELLIS ST
7. 1155 LEAVENWORTH
8. 2318 MAGNOLIA AVE
9. 551 BROADWAY
10. 114 SHINNECOCK
Alessandro Sangue (aka Alex, aka AX, aka Alexander, aka Alexander Sangue):
1. 2503 Park Hill CT E,
Could the Riis-family afford all this?
to the late Consul Riis Benedicte’s
husband, a sales man, never had a salary above average, which I believe was
some $40.000 a year. His wife worked, and still seems to be working as a
secretary with the Arup Ltd, 560
money on lawyers and court hearings is quite expensive in
By the way: If any of the above mentioned properties should appear to be owned by other persons today, one should run a check whether these new owners are affiliated with or could be relatives/friends to the Riis-Duryea family. It is not uncommon that friends or co-collaborators enter into shady agreements in order to conceal the reality. In this regard it is quite interesting to register that Stephen Charles Duryea seems to be operating with different names as he is listed as Stephen Duryea Te in this document, all of a sudden holding the very same last name as the recent owner of 146 Elsie st. Mrs. Te (there is a slight possibility that “Te” is the abbreviation of “Tenant” which in that case would cause even more problems for Mr. Duryea).
As you can rule out the possibility that Stephen Charles Duryea has funded the purchase of all these properties himself, we are left with the possibility that the funding origins from other sources, possibly from some kind of shady activities, like arms dealing. You have to go back and read this article again, and this.
If you put all the above mentioned persons in the same pot (which I believe you should, as they are sharing many of the addresses mentioned), we are then talking about a quite wealthy family which should not have any economical problems whatsoever, and which definitely was not entitled to free legal aid in Norway, which I landed for them.
which not correlates with performance and income should arouse suspicion. In
this case we are looking at a family which is associated with as many as 16
different properties. According to the family Kenneth Patrizio
Riis has lived in
me, and for all the politicians and other “helpers” in
Herman J Berge
 When I say ”bribed” I do this based on the following thesis: A civil servant/state official is responsible for the content of his documents. When he signs a paper, he knows what he is doing. If the information given in the document is not consistent with facts, the servant/official is obliged to see that the content is aligned with the facts. If he refuses to do so and signs the document despite the fact that he knows that this is wrong, the servant/official is either retarded or have in some way or other been bribed.
 For all practical purposes the late Consul Riis lived with another woman for the last 15 years of his life.
 The late Consul Riis reckoned Ektvedt as a traitor working for the Government. Ektvedt is mentioned in Riis’ will as a possible creditor to the estate. Despite the obvious fact that Ektvedt had conflicting interests in this case, he produced one news flash after the other.
 The settlement is not written on an official paper from the Ministry of Police and Justice, but rather on a piece of white paper without any heading, signed by a person with no power of attorney, which by the way died just weeks after the signing. Read this article concerning Mr. Gotaas’ his death.